Tweet
Investigative Reporting by Christina England
Parents and Carers worldwide are being accused of harming or killing their children when they show the SBS triad shortly after a vaccination. An alarming number of post vaccination adverse events are automatically assumed by medical and law enforcement professionals to occur because caregivers shake their babies so hard that they cause ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’, defined by a triad of serious brain injuries:
• Retinal haemorrhages (bleeding into the linings of the eyes);
• Subdural haemorrhages (bleeding beneath the dural membrane which covers the brain);
• Encephalopathy (inflammation and swelling of the brain).
Strangely, the medical professionals dismiss adverse reactions to recently administered vaccinations, while parents and carers are automatically assumed to be guilty of horrendous abuse, including the murder of the young children. However, if children are shaken so violently that it causes them to suffer from these extensive brain and retinal injuries, why don’t they also suffer from the expected external injuries that should also occur as a result of such a violent assault?
We need to ask ourselves, whether just shaking alone can cause these injuries, or are there alternative explanations as to why these injuries occur?
Another Family Comes Forward
A few months ago I wrote about the case of ‘Baby A,’ a five-month-old girl whose parents are on trial for her murder in the South Africa after being falsely accused of SBS. Baby A died within two weeks of receiving 8 vaccinations in one day. [1]
Baby A’s case sent shock waves around the world as people began to question how this could happen to an innocent and loving family.
Thankfully, due to my intervention and a number of expert witnesses who came forward to offer their help, the case has been postponed until the New Year. The court has permitted the family to send the previously missing medical records (which have mysteriously turned up) to their defence experts so they can study and comment on them.
Within weeks of baby A’s case widely publicized case, another family came forward asking for help. Tragically, this baby’s father was already on trial for murder: two weeks ago he was jailed for life after a UK Court found him guilty of shaking Amy, his 13 month-old daughter, to death.
Who Or What Really Killed Amy?
Amy was a healthy, happy, mischievous toddler until she received her MMR vaccine in May 2012. Within days, Darryl, Amy’s father, noticed a lump on the back of Amy’s head. The lump was obviously causing her some discomfort Darryl so when her mother returned home from work he took Amy to the local hospital.
When asked how she was injured, Darryl was unable to account for the lump but thought that the family’s puppy may have knocked Amy over. Later it appeared that the injury might have happened when Amy had banged her head on a coffee table whilst being changed at her grandma’s house.
‘Blame the Parent’ Theory
Whilst in hospital, the doctor noticed that Amy had a small bruise on the back of her calf and contacted social services because he believed that the bruise was a human bite mark. Social services decided to place the couple’s two children in the care of their grandparents pending further investigation.
After a full investigation, the hospital’s allegations that Amy had been bitten were unproven and social services returned both children to their parents.
Two months later however, things took a turn for the worst. After being ‘off colour’ all day, Amy was sick and Darryl decided to bath her. As he lifted her out of the bath, she slipped and banged her head, swallowing some water before bringing it backup. Darryl dried her, comforting her as he did so. He told me that he checked her over and noticed no signs of head trauma. In an email to me he wrote,
Sadly, Amy never recovered and died in hospital. Darryl was immediately arrested and charged with her murder.
Amy had no external injuries when she died and was diagnosed as suffering from a severe head trauma and pneumonia. Darryl was subsequently accused of shaking Amy so hard that he had caused her brain to swell and bleed.
According to his family, SBS was not mentioned to the family until after Darryl was arrested. Darryl’s felt frustrated with the continuous barrage of questions and felt that his main priority was to get back to the hospital to support Amy and her mother.
Parents and Carers worldwide are being accused of harming or killing their children when they show the SBS triad shortly after a vaccination. An alarming number of post vaccination adverse events are automatically assumed by medical and law enforcement professionals to occur because caregivers shake their babies so hard that they cause ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’, defined by a triad of serious brain injuries:
• Retinal haemorrhages (bleeding into the linings of the eyes);
• Subdural haemorrhages (bleeding beneath the dural membrane which covers the brain);
• Encephalopathy (inflammation and swelling of the brain).
Strangely, the medical professionals dismiss adverse reactions to recently administered vaccinations, while parents and carers are automatically assumed to be guilty of horrendous abuse, including the murder of the young children. However, if children are shaken so violently that it causes them to suffer from these extensive brain and retinal injuries, why don’t they also suffer from the expected external injuries that should also occur as a result of such a violent assault?
We need to ask ourselves, whether just shaking alone can cause these injuries, or are there alternative explanations as to why these injuries occur?
Another Family Comes Forward
A few months ago I wrote about the case of ‘Baby A,’ a five-month-old girl whose parents are on trial for her murder in the South Africa after being falsely accused of SBS. Baby A died within two weeks of receiving 8 vaccinations in one day. [1]
Baby A’s case sent shock waves around the world as people began to question how this could happen to an innocent and loving family.
Thankfully, due to my intervention and a number of expert witnesses who came forward to offer their help, the case has been postponed until the New Year. The court has permitted the family to send the previously missing medical records (which have mysteriously turned up) to their defence experts so they can study and comment on them.
Within weeks of baby A’s case widely publicized case, another family came forward asking for help. Tragically, this baby’s father was already on trial for murder: two weeks ago he was jailed for life after a UK Court found him guilty of shaking Amy, his 13 month-old daughter, to death.
Who Or What Really Killed Amy?
Amy was a healthy, happy, mischievous toddler until she received her MMR vaccine in May 2012. Within days, Darryl, Amy’s father, noticed a lump on the back of Amy’s head. The lump was obviously causing her some discomfort Darryl so when her mother returned home from work he took Amy to the local hospital.
When asked how she was injured, Darryl was unable to account for the lump but thought that the family’s puppy may have knocked Amy over. Later it appeared that the injury might have happened when Amy had banged her head on a coffee table whilst being changed at her grandma’s house.
‘Blame the Parent’ Theory
Whilst in hospital, the doctor noticed that Amy had a small bruise on the back of her calf and contacted social services because he believed that the bruise was a human bite mark. Social services decided to place the couple’s two children in the care of their grandparents pending further investigation.
After a full investigation, the hospital’s allegations that Amy had been bitten were unproven and social services returned both children to their parents.
Two months later however, things took a turn for the worst. After being ‘off colour’ all day, Amy was sick and Darryl decided to bath her. As he lifted her out of the bath, she slipped and banged her head, swallowing some water before bringing it backup. Darryl dried her, comforting her as he did so. He told me that he checked her over and noticed no signs of head trauma. In an email to me he wrote,
“Around 20 minutes later I left her on a sofa (40cm) left the room briefly to fetch her a drink and returned to find her on the floor facing the ceiling. I picked her up and she curled into a c shape position. I turned her round to face me, tipped her head forward where I saw her eyes rolling to the back of her head and she looked like she gasping for air. I panicked and shook her about 6 times then called 999.”
Sadly, Amy never recovered and died in hospital. Darryl was immediately arrested and charged with her murder.
Amy had no external injuries when she died and was diagnosed as suffering from a severe head trauma and pneumonia. Darryl was subsequently accused of shaking Amy so hard that he had caused her brain to swell and bleed.
According to his family, SBS was not mentioned to the family until after Darryl was arrested. Darryl’s felt frustrated with the continuous barrage of questions and felt that his main priority was to get back to the hospital to support Amy and her mother.
Comment